le genres!
Hi,
I’ve been thinking about genres in computer games. I’ve come to the conclusion that the first-person shooter (FPS) isn’t actually a genre.
In what sense is FPS a genre? It refers to an aspect of the game in question: the perspective of the player in the gaming world (whatever that world happens to be). But when considering any particular FPS, it shouldn’t be the first-person perspective which confines it to a genre; it should be the plot, the setting or subject, the kind and level of control the player is granted over their character or characters, or the emotional and atmospheric qualities.
Doom 3 is an example of an FPS. Again, the first-person player perspective is an aspect, but the fact that it’s scary (perhaps debatable, although I thought it was pretty damn frightening) and that the gameplay is centred around action is what should be taken into account when assigning it to a genre. If the player were forced into a third-person perspective, would it be right to assign it to a different genre? I think not. I’d describe Doom 3 as an ‘action horror’ game, or something to that effect.
More and more people are beginning to realise that the computer games industry is still in it’s youth; but also that it’s making leaps forward. Half-Life 2: Episode One is a perfect example of the way in which games developers are moving away from past mistakes and beginning to put more thought into character and narrative. I thought it was one of the finest games I’ve ever played, as well as a fine follow-up to the brilliant Half-Life 2. Redefining genres is one of many tasks for the gaming industry, specifically magazine writers and of course, gamers.
At least I’m doing my part.
See ya,
Eldilor
